Doubtful on the developments of the last days? try to better deal with this unknown factor that weighs on the indecipherable series of these crucial days. First of all: why nerve? Why is it these days that is concluding the discussion about the dL (Decree Law) 137 the Senate, after which the approval of the Minister Gelmini reform will be officially confirmed and will come into force. The DL 137 follows the trail opened up by Law 133. Contrary to most popular belief, what is being discussed these days is the approval of Law 133 - which appeared as Decree Law of June 25, 2008, and was approved as Law precisely, August 6, 2008, without any democratic debate in a position to challenge it - but the DL 137, that between now and tomorrow, that is, between October 28 to 29, topic will be dealt with by the Senate. That which we express and process, it is the non-approval of dL and 137 the repeal of Act 133, at least in part, specifically in art. 16 and 66 of Law 133/2008. Curious to know what they are about those articles? Presto said. Clause 16 (Law 133/2008): " Faculty of transformation of universities into foundations . Article 66 (Law 133/2008): "Turnover ". In short, the articles regarding the privatization of universities and, overall, the financial administration of the universities and thus, by extension, their general administration. This site has no space and no one is more appropriate to treat the Articles section by point, the options recommended in the context of the forthcoming meetings, events, or employment. These are, however, the articles in which the government has its roots in the complete disruption of the academic world, with onerous cuts to the following accounts in the red for years burden on the majority of Italian universities. The Minister Gelmini thought, according to the need of funds to banks and ICI, to "remedy" the severe economic conditions of universities with what the Minister likes to call "rationalization of Finance", more easily translatable into "open-minded and deep funding cuts." So the government strikes a fatal blow to the state universities, and abandon the sinking ship, intending to entrust them to private management. This also means a research aimed to private interests. In the same article also is cut much of the teaching staff, limited training for the staff of one every five lessons and recruitment, as a result of financial constraints, one arrives at a land tax liens inconceivable - taxes so high that the university elite, the prerogative of only more or less affluent population. A large part of what we've discussed in our events, anything to protest about university reform, is established in these articles. The attractiveness of the Minister Gelmini with four students - one in Pisa, Maurizio Falsone, a di Siena, Rome and two 3 - national representatives of Italian students has been quite a pseudotrattativa, made impossible by the attitude of uncompromising Minister, who intended to agree to repeal the Article. 16 and 66 of Law 133/2008 as a starting point for substantive discussions on the problems that harass the Italian universities.
But the demonstrations are not only voted to repeal art. 16 and art. 66 of Law 133/2008, but also to non-approval of dL 137. And you want to know how to debut this decree? It 'easy to say: "Section 2: Assessment of student behavior." That is to say, the voting behavior. But to press this point is not so much, but rather the fourth: "Article 4: Teacher only in primary school." And here the Saints fall, you will discover the altars. Have you heard to Year Zero, on the evening of Thursday, October 23, 2008, Porro said that the "full time", as requested by the family, has been widely discussed and formalized by the Law? Well, it's absolutely wrong, absolutely not found in the DL 137/2008. E 'was only his way of interpreting some very vague Art. 4, section 1 (exact words): "In the regulations it takes account of needs related to household demand, a broader articulation of school time. " Just to begin to clarify some key points . Before that, however, we should consider this passage of Art. 4, section 1 (dl 137/2008), 'and' further provided that educational institutions are entrusted to a single class teacher and operating time of twenty-four hours a week "So, if you do a quick calculation, dividing 24 hours a week for 6 days school staff, the resulting 4 hours a day. With an absolutely impartial mathematical calculation derived from the same dL, and a "full time" which is not even described as "full time", but the point remains very vague and not treated, someone still wants to try to hide behind misleading speeches, much rhetoric striking, and constant references to the manipulation? The Minister Gelmini does not take the democratic debate in order to deduce a bill more or less beneficial to all, able to ensure a high-school level and a concrete future. No, the Minister Gelmini imposes its amendments, appears to be biased and uncompromising, absolutely not willing to come to negotiations, to question your bill. Prefers to hide behind a finger, continue to say things even more incredible. For example, instead of addressing in detail the Law 133 and Decree 137, that's what he told Panorama page. Last number 70: " It 's a minority protest, before few who show there is a silent majority that wants to continue studying and exams. E' to this that the prime minister turned talking about intervention Police "(citation and text found). Sure, the numbers that you see nowadays are far from worrying. In Pisa have organized marches of over 20,000 people, as has not happened for 30 years, is absolutely no cause for concern. And throughout Italy are There is a higher education institutions and universities, it is absolutely not a particular concern. That in Rome hundreds of thousands of demonstrators take to the streets every day, and Thursday, October 30, 2008 is expected to strike with a million Protestants, it is absolutely no cause for concern. I hope you are feeling the irony. And the statements of an armed intervention? We spread a veil. Here's how the government attempts to repair a very serious statement: a plaster on a wound from shrapnel. And continuing the Minister: "It 'a political protest, and call on the left not to use the school and the university as a field of battle." Political protest? We can not deny that parties like the Communist Refoundation and Veltroni's Democratic Party We are marching on - this is, indeed, the task of the opposition. But the colossal mass of students that is moving is involved in a protest generally apolitical, that does not question the government but, again, the art. 16 and 66 of Law 133/2008, and the approval of Decree 137/2008, which will be discussed today and tomorrow in the Senate.
's why thousands of students will manifest themselves today and tomorrow are the most important dates. Numerous statements by the Minister Mariastella Gelmini, the last being a "door to door last night (Monday, 27 October 2008) would not be favorable. According to the Minister, the draft Law is now in the process too advanced and could no longer be blocked. The general belief is, therefore, that the dl 137 137 become law tomorrow. And then all of us, students, teachers, staff and precarious ATA, our protest will continue relentlessly, with greater zeal, and making us feel more than before.
Now, finally, remains unknown imposed on the mass student and not only: what will happen these days? This X is still difficult to determine. Large student movements also are protesting at this time in Rome and other major cities of Italy. We students of Lunigiana we are at a fateful crossroads: the aftermath the decisive day of protest for reform (best as counter) Gelmini, two days of the strike in Rome. Between now and tomorrow we should clarify the projects depending on developments in the Government, following the meeting to be held tomorrow, the last hour at the Liceo Classico, Liceo Scientifico Liceo and Sociopsicopedagogico, and based on information that arrive about the complimentary bus to Rome. The bus currently planned would be full, and only students willing to hold a second could reach the capital. But this is just another question that will answer tomorrow.
Tomorrow, in short, the answer will be a day or so we hope. We hope to organize effectively and, based on the number of those who intend to go to Rome on Thursday to protest an order with a certain criterion the time remaining in these crucial days of the end of October.
As usual, the point remains the same: stick together, always. Make us feel. Remind everyone that we have.
0 comments:
Post a Comment